We've all had this conversation at one point or another with friends - both marveling at and judging the lack of internet savvy by our parents. I just had another one this morning. I can basically summarize it to: Why is it so difficult for them to send emails? I couldn't say what number this particular conversational occurrence was, but it's well into the double digits. It wasn't until recently that I exchanged the first text with my mother (Although in fairness, she lives internationally, or technically, I guess I'm the one that does.) and it's been a struggle to get both of my parents to see the use of and need for communicating over the internet that way. It seems like moms always say, "Why not just pick up the phone and call?" It set me to wondering out loud what would be the advancement in technology that sets my generation apart from the one that follows.
One of my friends quickly pointed out that it
would not be just the one, and then we both set to begrudgingly admitting that disruption was probably already here in the resistance we both feel for
social media. It was not a good feeling. I certainly liked to think that I'd be
much better at technological adaptation than my parents. I was seduced by the
idea that because I am apart of the generation that came online as teenagers
with the internet - arguably the most defining advance in technology for the
past two generations - that I would be predisposed to such flexibility. After
getting shoved off that elitist plateau, I readily admit to not taking a deep
liking to social media. I've never questioned myself as to why that is though.
The default answer has been that I'm more private than most. Just the mere
thought of sharing what I'm thinking with friends is already a bit much for me
(sorry loved ones!), let alone sharing these thoughts publicly. Still, the
privacy answer seems commonplace and superficial.
If I dig deeper there's probably some form of
vulnerability I feel in starting over, of recreating a hard earned identity in
real life for an online one. It's a realization of the effort and time that
takes. It's also a bit of the classic: why change anything that's working? None
of that is so surprising I guess. You wouldn't be a very astute student of
human nature if you didn't predict inertia and resistance in response to such a
significant change. If I fight past those reflexive defenses, however, I can
see the value of social media (sharing, connecting, bolstering ties, etc).
Ironically, I see it most clearly in a business context (probably because I'm
in the middle of a job search...). What better way have we discovered to judge
people over time than by what they think and produce? A resume seems grossly
deficient in this day and age. I would rather be judged by the content and
merit in my thoughts, projects and actions online than have those assumed in my
absence after a one hour encounter over one sheet of paper. The more
information we have the better decisions we can make. And if I am diligent
enough I can control my own chunk of big data.
I'm sure that just begins to peel back the
layers, but whatever the reasons I feel such a resistance, as a direct result, I
was most certainly a late comer to Facebook, this is technically my
first blog post (under my real name at least), and I have only just
signed up for a Twitter account (also the first under my real name @simmserely).
I guess we'll see where this goes. Don't judge me if I relapse.
No comments:
Post a Comment